Do you see in my hand no hard therapeutic on a subject in terminally ill - in its funny job if intends -
but even if it happens to me to take a walk in the gardens of Sainte Anne i have never crossed a subject such that Charles-Henri Orliac which seems to me reached for diarrhea
epistolary. Too many words killed the sincerity Mr. the impostor, shut up you Orliac! Tuck in your niche to Nice!
If you have the time to lose take knowledge of what follows it is edifying. It is long as a etron and tenacious as a tapeworm. The only risk that I
take in publishing is to receive a jetting and i do not have a PQ for this kind of diarrhea.
1- Letter sent to the editorial team of Wine&Gastronomy) e remained to this day no response on the part of the
Directorate:
Dear Mr. Sacuto & drafting team of Wines & Gastronomy,
Further to our telephone discussion of this afternoon about the visit of Mr. Charles Henry Orliac to sell us a page of press in the magazine wine
& gastronomy for the #140 of September October, we wish to point out to you a strong abuse and our great displeasure.
We signed an agreement for a article of 1/3-page paid for by check to 1070.42 euros the Monday, July 11 (see the contract as an attachment). In the contract,
it was planned to receive Mr. Orliac on Thursday afternoon July 14 to test the restaurant.
We have accepted with great pleasure to participate in this edition of respect for the work of Mr. Sacuto who had written a wonderful article on Bernard
in the field of Murtoli in Corsica, in addition we are drives and appreciate the quality of this magazine to good taste.
Why our dissatisfaction this Thursday afternoon July 14,
· Mr. Orliac coming to lunch with his family (3 persons), ordered a bottle of the domain of the Rocket 1998 to 87.00 euros on our map. Adding a
total of 201.- Euro (see invoice in attachment). At the time of settlement, Mr. Orliac we argues that the meal of all were included in the addition & refused to settle the
consumption in its family. It seemed to us to provide the normal meals of Mr. Orliac and delighted that he shared our table with her lovely family. But in no event to provide a meal for his
wife and his son & even less to offer a bottle of wine to 87.- euros. Mr. Orliac is departed without adjust the invoice extra of his family.
· In a second time, the family Orliac insisted heavily to have their "offer" 3 nights at the hotel in exchange for a 1/2 page article in the magazine.
Although complete for the weekend of July 14, he still insists heavily. Allow me to emphasize the lack of education and professionalism, it does not prompt to the unannounced a
weekend of July 14 in a hotel to make a news article. You are right in thinking that in full season the rooms are reserved for customers!
We are traders and do not have to enjoy the holiday with the family of journalists who are paid a press article. We are extremely disappointed
by this behavior rude, moves & by a lack of respect for our work, especially given the reputation of your magazine. We would like to receive explanations and that this
unfortunate incident is repaired or at least understood.
In all cases we reject that Mr. Orliac would seem though that is on our property. We don't want to be described through the pen
of a character as ambiguous in that it lacks as much panache. "The spears plates" that are bought for a meal do not interest us. We want an institution of quality, friendly
and generous, we have the love of our profession and the grossness of the people who do not know the respect.
In the expectation of receiving of your news, we are sending you our sincere greetings & all our respect to Mr. Sacuto.
2- Response of CHO the caught-suckers
Madam, Sir,
I admit, very sincerely have been appalled at the reading of the mail that you have thought it appropriate to speak to "Mr Sacuto and team of editor of Wines &
Gastronomy", (in french, in the text!) in date of the July 15, 2011 at 17h07, mail which I received directly, but perhaps not intentionally, and in which, in a French cannot
be more approximate (addition stinted spelling mistakes), you were eventually going to my place, if this is a "indictment" in rule, at least a "table" inflammatory, misleading, and
really fallacious!
If this is the fact that we have, indeed, signed, dated July 11, 2011, order no.002251 and to have made to the order of the magazine a check in the amount of
1,070.40 € no.6070474 issued on the Farm Credit, your entire prose (here I am really friendly!) is not that pure much fanfare and duplicity!
How do you eventually, and for what purpose of elsewhere, on one side to be able to "praise" on this point "a" Mr. Sacuto that you would have met in Corsica a
few years ago, when in a story, or a solicitation, when that there would be unquestionably error on your part on the person (Mr. Gaby Sacuto, being the brother of Mr. Yves
Sacuto, the sole and exclusive owner of the magazine, which has, in addition, never heard of you), and, on the other hand, just as arbitrarily, me "vomit" on it?
Do you think, sincerely, on the one hand, that this is very subtle, strategically speaking it means, and on the other hand, that this is consistent with the strict reality of the
facts?
I then well you say that not!
We are, you and me, the only two (my wife and my son in having been the witnesses partially) to know the truth, and I stated there that you have not
only "transvestite" the facts, but, even worse, than those that you expose are the pure product of your only imagination !!!
This is serious enough for that I enrolled in false, that I questioned point by point your story affabulateur, and that i reinstate a principle which
would appear you do totally fault!
Not being an employee of Wines & Gastronomy such as you would, but a collaborator for quite some time, with all the confidence that this may
require hand and on the other, that is, here, just lost that to try to make myself lecturing in awarding me all ills, with the appropriate qualifiers noisemakers to a approach delatrice, which
would pass through your spirit grief!
You do, Madam, not the least credible of the world, and the worst in all of this, it is you know it not even account!
I will therefore, since you asked me to force them, for your "information", and that of your husband who has perceived, to your hand, that a version "falsified",
watered and diffamatrice, resume the genesis of the story!
First of all, you have been contacted, by phone, the Thursday, July 7, and have given to my wife an appointment, the same evening, toward 19h30!
You told him, actually, made mention of your knowledge of "a" Mr. Sacuto that you would have, moreover, formally recognized in the magazine on the
photograph, which is on the first page of the magazine!
That is to say, we can have confidence in your "testimony"!
However, this is a first story perfectly inaccurate, heavy consequences if the it refers to what follows!
In spite of your 'admiration without terminals" to the sieur Sacuto in question, (and although there is error on the person), as well as the magazine that, to read to you,
would be almost considered as a reference to the subject (and ,why not, your favorite bedtime book! ), force will be to see that you want to of the free (and nothing that), and that it
will take to my wife all the wisdom and the patience which animate in such cases, to lead you to the "negotiation" of a publi-reportage to be issued on our next edition, the #140 of
September - October 2011!
For page, point question, half-page, point yet! Just accept you to consider a quarter or a third of page which you may need to discuss the feasibility
with your husband during the weekend because the friday 8 represented your opening day!
Appointment was therefore taken to the 11 July, in the vicinity of 10:30.
I ran to the agreed upon time, and here, surprise surprise, the magazine as a "venerable" only retained more of the all your attention, to the point of me a
categorical refusal, and not even embarrassed!
It took me almost an hour and a quarter and, finally, the presence of your husband during the next twenty minutes, to negotiate with you one-third of page at the rate
of one quarter, either 895 € H. T instead of 1,190 € H. T, in addition to a small article offered on the Contemporary magazine, and the passage of the article written by my care on my personal blog, and
professional, for you decide! Nothing less!
In addition, with the aim of a certain quality, and integrity, at the level of the drafting, i you intended either to write the article in accordance with a topo transmitted by your
care accompanied by the card-menu, method, in my opinion, much less personalized and consistent with my way of proceeding in the matter, is to invite us, gracefully, without any obligation
on your part, you was suggesting i heavily, my wife, my son and myself, with our three "approaches" (sometimes) different, to "enjoy" the kitchen of your husband, and write
the article according to our "felt" and of a time truly lived!
You say that you agree, apparently happy, inviting us to lunch the Thursday, JULY 14!
Until then you are probably aware, therefore, no way that we would be three, and the free of the service!
In addition, cautious by nature, and as is my habit, i did clearly on the agenda to sign by your care in the topic of comments!
You were chasing, after coup, a visit to your rule of guest house, rooms, lounge, cellar, and rooms!
It is true that having found that the weekend of July 14 was, side accommodation, for the least saturated on Saint-rémy and all its environs up to 40 or even 50
miles to the round, my wife would have you (o sacrilegious! ), on the phone, on 13 July, in the exchange of a possible increase in size by one-third in a half-page (nuance enormous with
your "version" of misleading the suggestion of a half-page for three additional nights), proposed the "test" on three nights (what we are practicing to length of the year, as it is,
then, my main vocation as a columnist) of your guest house which was not, far from it, in this period, "overwhelmed" by the clientele!
It had nothing of jumper, nor of shocking!
But, you would have preferred decline the offer, but not without a certain amount of bitterness, and truly without having understood nothing at the suggestion, evidence, if any, of your
"interpretation" !
However, on that day, we went to three, as agreed, to 12h30-13h, after a confirmation telephone the same morning!
You didn't find anything to object!
I even declined your "offer" of appetizer, on the terrace, preferring to spend directly to table, in the light of the time! Well I would have taken, because you
would not have hesitated, later, to stick grievance!
I want, here, to make it clear that we were, for the whole room of meals, and terrace, the only guests present! Only a table of three se will be attached to us
half an hour later!
Perhaps that was the foundation of your unfair wrath to my place!
You have suggested, on slate, the dishes of the day, without ever stipulate that there would be free that for my person!
It had been, we have to admit, pretty cheap!
You commit, with my son, a dialog with regard to your card of wines that you switched him into their own hands (explaining even that it was leather of
recovery of at Hermes), and your cellar consisting mainly of regional appellations if it is local, and we advise, in particular, two very different wines, depending on
our tastes, a Field The rocket- Chateauneuf-du-Pape-1998 and a domain of Trevallon-2003 representative to your eyes to one side the discovery, and the other the reference!
We options for a discovery "measured" displayed on your map to 87 €, and this even though it was an invitation!
The "discovery" that appears in your hands, you can put it in carafe, a Grail very precisely, to "ventilate" the wine!
I was not going to, in surplus, ask you about the free wine offers!
We have, do you not like Madam, a any other meaning of the know-live and the know-how, in a word, an education which forbids us to let us go to
the excesses of any kind!
It is a second nature which does not appear, far from it, you animate!
Proof if ever there is the "slippage" (the "chest thumping of pellets" would be more appropriate!) that you viewed the when that i'd of the toilet, your husband Bernard
Colema which was not even time require our sensations with regard to its kitchen (in contrast to a custom fairly widespread among your peers), your husband, I said, took me,
welcoming me to death, and to question me to know where it should go here!
My disappointment was such that I must confess, I would welcome it, on the time, they had not really understood that "cà" corresponded to the invoice object lunch!
How could I consider such a turnaround of posture, and what he should not hesitate to call on abuse of confidence?
Even with a lot of imagination, and perversion, how could you imagine a single second that i could be moved to come spend a few extra €201 in
your establishment, therefore that this had never been agreed, and, especially, that this would be almost to my commission on the contract signed?
It was already a heresy that of the design!
In deepening, I understood the words of your husband, either that he was only pretending not to be aware of the free of the benefit, either that you do him in
had nothing mentioned!
Yet, my wife by going to the toilet to the end of the meal, you would have very clearly heard clear to your husband: "They want to test, well, they
will test! "
.
Which augured already to your state of mind, and of the swindles that you "mijotiez" for the end of the service!
I was explaining to him, therefore, by the detail, our "agreement", and this without even having seen, or been in hand, your note, or even have been aware of the amount, indicating
that there was no question that I rule although it is!
You commit then, Madam, in a "dance" ludicrous sensible me singer, and in which, undoubtedly, i do not admit!
My fleur de lys, another possibility, you would have put it, to this point, in turmoil?
Because to you see pathetically run of crazy facial expressions, tone of voice in addition (to the Marie-Chantal , would you!) at this point entangled in your
truths, you are traveling more same account of the ridiculous to your attitude, or even a turpitude unveiled!
I took leave courteously, although the envy me titillait of you chastise roundly!
During the afternoon, your husband left a message on my laptop for the further contact, what i do fearlessness not to make the surroundings of 17h.
The discussion, quiet enough in fact, after a serious development, completely ignoring the "notes" object of the scandal, and confirmed the drafting of your
article to which i had to communicate to you, for your information, a copy by mail of the next week!
I had pledged myself to do so, as far as possible, abstraction in my article of your deplorable attitude!
For me, the case was therefore closed!
Nope! Since the next day, believing contact the owner of the magazine, you "repandiez", Madam, to my subject, from Gaby Sacuto, that I
know, and that I felt, on his laptop, for me to "assassinate" in terms more than scathing, and spurious to say the least!
You join, to the speech, writing, such as a ecrivaillon, by sending a mail confusing as i returned to the beginning of the present, flanked by the famous
note which i liked finally the amount, is 201 euros!
All this fuss, this whole infamy for a breakfast, offered in addition, which the assumed cost, and the lack of profits (will-y boldly! ), function of the
undeniable lack of clientele in this July 14, would be, wine included, to 201 Euros!!!
The "loop would have been fastened" if and only if, you had committed a great error of evaluation, and light, on the net, my place, not
only about intolerable, but also, specious and treacherous to the environment!
I would be able to answer therefore by not publishing on the #140 of our edition that a advertising of a third of page (according to the agreed format) on a black background, with logo,
photos, text and coordinates, in all points similar to the document that you stream currently, but also, by the way, as promised on my personal blog (nothing to do with Wines &
Gastronomy, I reassure you!) article detailed conforms to my "felt" and "lived" !
Receive, Madam, my greetings.
Charles-Henri Orliac
Columnist "assessor "gourmet and hotelier
Wines & Gastronomy
Latest Comments