September 28, 2012

A unacceptable interference

Chronic policy of the Friday morning of each morning on luxury Luxury Radio

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

72bae3d4-026b-11e2-8c7d-03d597da66a1-493x328

We knew the close links between the United States and Israel. They are expressed by a policy of support and assistance which has never been lacking in the Hebrew State. We knew the activism of the American Jewish lobby in Washington, in favor of the government of Jerusalem. We knew the unconditional support of the United States Congress in regard to Israel.

But, we did not know that Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, was part of the American presidential election. It is imposed in the duel Obama-Romney , by displaying its preferences, asking openly to the Americans to vote for the Republican candidate. Bibi Netanyahu has become a true actor of the US campaign, a position which expresses especially its embers to the regard of the president in office, Barak Obama.

Netanyahu knows that the re-election of Obama is going to translate by the requirements difficult to set aside, in the first place the judgment of the colonization, the dismantling of the settlements and wild the resumption of israeli-palestinian negotiations, with a goal, the establishment of a Palestinian State, coherent and viable. The first term of any president in the United States always expresses a policy constrained by the problem of the re-election. The second term, get rid of the electoral contingencies, allows the President re-elected, to express its entire policy and nothing that its policy.

Netanyahu knows more than anyone else. It is for this that he tried to mobilize the jewish electorate, traditionally democrat, in favor of Romney. It does not hesitate, by its posturing of goes to war vis-à-vis Iran to try to push Obama to the fault. The American voter would pay dearly to the tenant of the White House a perspective, see a promise of a new military adventure. While the Middle East is boiling over, that an American ambassador is murdered in Libya, that the training of Afghan forces is frozen sine die, Romney, using his new ally policy,Benjamin Netanyahu, will attempt to tarnish the balance sheet of the tombeur of Bin Laden.

The irruption of unacceptable Netanyahu in the US presidential campaign does not disassembled not Obama who said, I quote: "I share and understand his insistence on the need to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons, but in regard to the decisions of national security, the

images

Only pressure -he- feels is to do what is good for the American people. "And to add: "If Mitt Romney believes that we should engage a new war, he should say clearly. " End of quote. The tactic of Netanyahu is seen as counter-productive by many Israeli officials.Netanyahu is playing a dangerous game, that already, of the Israeli political, military officials at the highest level and some members of his cabinet accuse him. They consider that its policy will be much more apparent to a poker game.

The eventual election, and between we likely, to Barak Obama, is likely to cost a team Netanyahu.Barak Obama should meditate this reflection, old of more than a century, another politician: "God, protected me from my friends, my enemies i am in charge. "

Post by gabrielbanon to 11:17 AM - - Comments [ 1] - Trackbacks [ 0] - into your permalink [#]



September 22, 2012

The misfiring of the Arab spring

Chronic policy of the Friday morning of each morning on luxury Luxury Radio

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DownloadedFile

It will be enough of a so-called film of inflammatory propaganda, to ignite the arab street.

Forgotten, the Americans and the Europeans, who are required to the sides of the revolutionary movements, up to engage militarily, to help the overthrow of the despot of Tripoli and elsewhere.

Forgotten, the speech of the Cairo of Obama, extending to the Arab world.

Forgotten, this symbol of a brotherhood of struggle that had become this diplomat out of the common, Chris Steven. Arabic style with passionate, he had shared the anguish of the inhabitants of Benghazi during the endless summer 2011.

Forgotten, the millions of dollars paid to help the Arab populations in Palestine, Egypt, Libya, Yemen and elsewhere.

It will be enough of a handful of fanatics irresponsible to trigger the anger of the arab street. To whom? Toward the ideal scapegoat, the

priereparis

United States . In truth, the arab street is a bomb to the provision of all the extremists, which exploded at the request, provided it is given a target, preferably American, and of simple slogans and mobilizers, as defend Islam and its prophet. It can be seen today, how easy it is to throw it in the street of hordes of excited, everywhere in the world. There is one more time, the manipulation of a Islamist fringe which has long been committed to confiscate the Islam.

The Salafist do not like these political transitions that have taken place in a democratic framework. These jihadists do not like those revolutionaries who have been deprived of speech as program. This new solidarity, between western and Arab children of the spring, is considered by these same jihadists, as a mortal threat to their movement. It is this community of ideas, that of preachers of hate across the Atlantic and terrorists in Cyrenaica and elsewhere, are striving to break down. The outrages that represents this vile video, are the work of small groups which do not handle other weapon than a hate propaganda and desired a provocation, the violent consequences desired.

This is to say, if the events in which we are witnessing, fill with easy these provocateurs. In the current context, the intolerance and xenophobia are thriving, and we blame easily of scapegoats, between other, America. After the arab spring, with globalization, we come to a crossroads, where the choices are clear, either the establishment of democracy, it will have to defend at any cost, or waive it for a time or never. The uncertainty that La Ronge in many countries, poor governance that prevails in many others, are the bed of extremism and the political paranoia.

A infected video, the inexcusable violence, give me to paraphrase Tocqueville, if the law allows the citizen to do everything, at least that the moral of it all, dare to defend.

Post by gabrielbanon to 6:06 PM - - Comments [ 0] - Trackbacks [ 0] - into your permalink [#]

September 15, 2012

The battle of the euro

Chronic policy of the Friday morning of each morning on luxury Luxury Radio

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

images

Since that the tankers had envisaged to be paid in euro, since China had declared consider diversifying its foreign exchange reserves by including the euro, the European currency was submitted to a real war, any azimuth.Touch to the world dominance of the dollar was considered by the Americans, as a threat to national sovereignty, of a country that lives on credit, to the detriment of the global economy.

We stigmatisa the weakness of the economy of the euro area, one of the finger pointa debt "untenable" of the countries of the south of the European union, to finish by saying, simply, that it was necessary to put an end to this experience, in short, the euro should disappear. The America, debt to the abyssal, to the sick economy, was not a problem to these distinguished economists. No one would have the crazy idea to consider the disappearance of the dollar.And yet, the other things being equal, the reasoning applied to the euro, should in any logical, apply to any area in economic crisis, precluding the dollar zone.

The reality is that the further construction of the European Union, is afraid to those whose the hegemony of their economy, is the cornerstone of their policy. It must be recalled that the crisis that has hit Europe, and particularly the countries of the Union who were reluctant to carry out the restructuring that imposed by the globalization, and the adjustments as demanded by the evolution of the demography, had taken birth in the United States. Certainly, the single currency banned the use of devaluation "regional" and the protectionist measures of yesteryear. The error has been put in place a single currency, without having previously, equip the European Union of the control bodies of budgetary and economic policies of member countries.

6

How can we speak of a united Europe, without harmonizing its social structures, tax, banking or legal. How can we talk of solidarity,sansaccepter a next to the Union on the use of the aid occtroyees. Out of the crisis was going on by most of Europe, it is to be what they are attacking the successive summits of the European leaders. The European mechanism of stability (MY), the implementation of the ECB, the European central bank, in the heart of the device, the golden rule for a fiscal discipline, the supervision of banks of the Union by the ECB, are as much of measures to make credible out of the crisis by a united Europe and organized. The draft european union banking, presented last Wednesday in Brussels, granted to the ECB with supervisory authority over the 6000 banks in the euro area, January 2013.

6-1

The decision of the German constitutional court, allowing for the adoption by Berlin, of new mechanisms of rescue of the euro area, lifted the latest mortgages on the desire of Germans to defend the single currency, their currency, as in all the States of the Union. The Bundestag and the Bundesrat had ratified the treaty of my last June, with a big majority. The European institutions embody the european legitimacy. It should give them the means to do this. The latest provisions give them the answers that they were waiting. By the decision of the constitutional court in Karlsruhe, Angela Merkel is seeing its authority asserted, and it is so much the better for the European Union.

Post by gabrielbanon to 8:45 PM - Comments [ 0] - Trackbacks [ 0] - into your permalink [#]

September 08, 2012

The Russians to return to Afghanistan?

Chronic policy of the Friday morning of each morning on luxury Luxury Radio

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

images-2

The army of the former USSR has conducted for ten years, from 1979 to 1989, a war in Afghanistan against the mujahidin. This war, because of the involvement of the United States, has been regarded as the last crisis of the cold war. Since then, there was the 11 September 2001, the largest terrorist attack of all time, with its three thousand victims. THE UNITED NATIONS responded by putting in place the ISAF, the intervention force in Afghanistan. It was the hunting to the members of the nebula terrorist, Al Qaida and its leader and inspirer, Osama Bin Laden.

And this is a new war in Afghanistan, this time conducted by those who had contributed to throw the Russians out of their zone of influence. A war being waged by a Western coalition, with the United States as the principal conductor of the orchestra and essential contributor. It is in the context of a war against terrorism and a hunted without mercy of Bin Laden, that the Boys Americans there were sent by thousands. The invoice in human lives and in dollars, is heavy for all participants, head in America.

The death of Bin Laden does not weaken the Taliban, but provides an excuse for Americans to accelerate the end of a military adventure become unpopular in the United States. It is of 2010, at the NATO summit in Lisbon, that the States involved in the Intervention Force in Afghanistan, had decided to withdraw their fighting forces in later in 2014. The coalition believes that the mandate given by the United Nations has been filled, by the pacification of a number of areas, such as the valley of the Kapisa, the death of Bin Laden and the training of the Afghan national army, estimated ready to take the relay.

Moscow does not share this optimism, both on the liquidation of the terrorism that the pacification. That said Vladimir Putin? I quote: "It is regrettable that many participants in this operation of Nato are thinking of the way to withdraw… they should support the burden and go up to the end. They have made commitments and should carry out their mission to the United Nations. "And his minister of foreign affairs to emphasize: "The precipitate withdrawal of the coalition forces, deployed in Afghanistan, has risks of destabilization in the region. " End of quote.

images-1

One may ask why Putin's Russia does it both to the presence of the fighting forces of NATO, American head, the doors of the great Russia. Moscow is experiencing two fears before the departure of the forces of the NATO, on the one hand the intensification of the trafficking of drugs in the direction of Russia, on the other hand, and especially, the resurgence of Islamic activities, or even terrorists, on the borders of the Muslim republics of Central Asia.

To fill the vacuum that will cause the departure of the western, empty that will not fill the Afghan army, the rehiring of Russia is not excluded. Afghanistan has always been regarded by Moscow as part of its areas of influence. No doubt that Moscow will go far enough to prevent those that she continues to call the terrorists, namely the Taliban, to take power there. In 1989, when Soviet troops leaving Afghanistan, driven by the Afghan resistance, no one could have imagined that twelve years later, the Federation would be to return. In the meantime, Moscow collaborated with those who have helped this Afghan resistance, tried to persuade them to sursoir at the outset, and even using for example the French forces to get away from the maze afghan by Russia. This may explain the infinite patience of western with regard to the Russian Federation on the Syrian track.

Post by gabrielbanon to 08:34 AM - - Comments [ 0] - Trackbacks [ 0] - into your permalink [#]



1